WOS samples what they’re saying in the (Spanish-language) Latin American media about Rep. Peter Hoekstra’s charge that the U.S. intelligence has not been held accountable for the anti-drug attack that killed an American missionary and her child
From the forgotten annals of the drug war
Hoekstra says ‘Justice Denied’ in CIA Shootdown of Missionaries in Peru – ABC News.
Update on Morley v. CIA
People keep asking me, “What’s up with the lawsuit?”
Its a hurry up and wait type of deal. Judge Richard Leon, a Bush II appointee in the U.S. Circuit Court of the District of Columbia, will rule sometime this year on which, if any, of the JFK files of the deceased CIA officer George Joannides, must be made public. If you want regular updates, friend me on Facebook.
If you’re wondering, Who the hell was George Joannides and what is this story about, here’s how to find out.
I broke the story of Joannides’ curious role in the JFK story in the weekly Miami New Times back in 2001. I sued the CIA for his records in 2003. Many, if not most, of the serious JFK scholars agree with me that the CIA should comply.
If you want more detail about the Joannides investigation has evolved since, check out this video interview I did for the MaryFerrell.org, the most useful site on the Web for JFK scholars because it is more devoted to data than theories.
If you want diverse political perspectives on the Joannides story, Jacob Hornberger has applied the libertarian scapel. Blogger Machetera comes at the story from the perspective of the Latin left.
And if you are daunted by the mere idea of JFK details and polemics, you are not alone. For the K.I.S.S. version of the story, you only need to read my piece last spring in Talking Points Memo. It has an exclusive photo of Joannides getting a medal for his espionage.
One final point: If you Google “George Joannides” you will see a number of stories and blog posts linking him to the assassination of Robert Kennedy. I won’t comment on or link to these stories because they are based on a weak 2007 BBC report that proved to have no foundation in fact.
Some conspiracy theories are obvious b.s. and there’s no harm in saying so.
Is it dumb to think JFK might have been ambushed by his enemies?
Yes, says Times of London columnist David Aaronovitch in an interview with Salon.
We want to believe theories that contradict the idea that young, iconic people died senselessly. If a story takes away the accidental from their death, it gives them agency. After the JFK assassination, it was unbearable to many people that they could live in a country where a lone gunman could kill a president.
This familiar trope has a general psychological cogency–yes, we all turn to History for meaning–but, in the particular case of Kennedy’s assassination on November 22, 1963, it lacks a specific historical foundation. Aaronovitch is touting a book about conspiratorial thinking, with the appealing tag line “When smart people believe dumb things.” Yet his pitch neglects the disconcerting fact that there were plenty of smart people who concluded that Kennedy was killed by a conspiracy of his political enemies–and they did so rationally.
